Travel Commentary

bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark bookmark

TRAVEL INDUSTRY EMPLOY’S MANY

Words spoken by the currant administration seemingly wants to limit business travel, conventions, expo’s and vacation perks. If any government money is involved (even if the companies were forced to take it) they want to impose rules and restrictions set by politicians instead of business men and company owners. On one hand they want to restrict business travel and conventions and then on the other hand they are worried about a poor economy and loss of jobs. DUH!

House Examines Bill to Jump-Start Travel Economy

Published on: September 12, 2008

In testimony before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Geoff Freeman, senior vice president for public affairs at the Travel Industry Association (TIA), said that the decline in overseas travel to the United States since 9/11 has cost America 46 million visitors, $140 billion in lost visitor spending and $23 billion in lost tax revenue. If the United States had simply kept pace with global travel trends in 2007, an additional 340,000 jobs would have been created.
Freeman said that despite the fact that the United States is a travel bargain with the dollar at an all-time low, it received 2 million fewer overseas visitors in 2007 than 2000. He said that the Travel Promotion Act, H.R. 3232, introduced by Reps. William Delahunt (D-Mass.) and Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), would provide a much-needed economic stimulus. It establishes a public-private partnership to promote the United States as a premier international travel destination and communicate U.S. security and entry policies. The bill specifies that travel promotion would be paid for at no cost to U.S. taxpayers. Funds would be generated by private sector contributions and a modest fee on foreign travelers that do not pay $131 for a visa to enter the United States. Nearly every developed nation in the world spends millions of dollars to attract visitors.
Overseas visitors stay longer and spend more — an average of $4,000 per traveler, per visit — than domestic travelers ($376 per person, per trip on average) or visitors from Canada and Mexico ($1,200). Oxford Economics projects that a $100 million travel promotion program would result in millions more overseas visitors to the United States and yield at least $8 billion per year in new visitor spending and $850 million per year in new federal tax revenue.
Freeman noted that the United States has made great progress in improving security measures since 9/11 but has neglected to ensure that security enhancements are balanced by sensible investments in travel facilitation and an effort to communicate changing security requirements to international travelers. The subcommittee hearing marks the beginning of the final push toward enactment of the bill. H.R. 3232 is co-sponsored by 240 members of the House of Representatives, including more than three-quarters of the members of House Committee on Energy and Commerce. A Senate companion bill, S. 1661, co-sponsored by 48 senators, has already been reported to the Senate floor by the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation. For more information, visit www.tia.org.

No Responses to “Travel Commentary”

Post a Comment